TEMSO
Teriflunomide
TEMSO established once-daily oral teriflunomide as a relapse-reducing therapy and showed a disability effect at the 14 mg dose.
- Phase
- Phase III
- Population
- Relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)
- Controlled period
- Sep 2004 — Jul 2010
What was compared
Teriflunomide 14 mg
Orally once daily
Placebo
Matching oral tablet once daily
Additional randomized arm
Teriflunomide 7 mg
Orally once dailyPrimary endpoint
Annualized relapse rate
108 weeks
Primary endpoint results
Annualized relapse rate
Relapses per participant-year
31.5% and 31.2% relative reductions (P<0.001 for both doses).
Selected secondary outcomes
20.2% with 14 mg versus 27.3% with placebo (P=0.03).
Both doses were superior to placebo across prespecified MRI outcomes.
Who was studied
Key inclusion criteria
- Age 18–55 years
- RMS diagnosis based on McDonald criteria 2001
- Baseline EDSS ≤ 5.5
- At least 1 relapse in the previous year or at least 2 in the previous 2 years
- No relapse in the 60 days before randomization
Key exclusion criteria
- Other systemic disease
- Pregnancy or plans to conceive during the trial
Participants at baseline
| Characteristic | Teriflunomide 7 mgN=366 | Teriflunomide 14 mgN=359 | PlaceboN=363 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years — mean ± SD | 37.4 ± 9.0 | 37.8 ± 8.2 | 38.4 ± 9.0 |
| Female sex — n (%) | 255 (69.7%) | 255 (71.0%) | 275 (75.8%) |
| Time since MS symptom onset, years — mean ± SD | 8.8 ± 6.8 | 8.7 ± 6.7 | 8.6 ± 7.1 |
| EDSS — mean ± SD | 2.68 ± 1.34 | 2.67 ± 1.24 | 2.68 ± 1.34 |
| Relapses in the previous year — mean ± SD | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.7 |
| DMT use in the previous 2 years — n (%) | 102 (27.9%) | 102 (28.4%) | 90 (24.8%) |
| Gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions present — n/N (%) | 127/360 (35.3%) | 125/355 (35.2%) | 137/359 (38.2%) |
SD: standard deviation; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; DMT: disease-modifying therapy.
Source: O’Connor et al., NEJM 2011, Table 1
Safety signal
- Diarrhea, nausea, and hair thinning were more common with teriflunomide.
- Mild alanine aminotransferase elevation was more frequent; marked elevation and serious infection rates were similar among groups.
Why it mattered
TEMSO supplied pivotal evidence that an oral immunomodulator could reduce relapses, with a confirmed-disability benefit at the 14 mg dose. It broadened oral treatment options without using the S1P-modulator mechanism tested in the fingolimod programs.
Important limitation
The study tested two doses and several MS courses; interpretation of the disability result is specific to the 14 mg comparison.